search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube instagram Spotify Podcasts Apple Podcasts Spotify Podcasts Apple Podcasts
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • NEWS
  • TOPICS
    • Cool Roofing
    • Event News
    • Latinos in Roofing
    • Low Slope
    • Legal
    • Metal
    • Project Profiles
    • Roofing Supply Pro
    • Roofing Safety
    • Steep Slope
    • Sustainable Roofing
    • Technology
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Best of Success
    • Contractor Profile
    • IRE Show
    • Roofing Contractor of the Year
      • Enter Roofing Contractor of the Year
    • Top 100
      • Enter the Top 100
    • Young Guns
    • State of the Industry
  • MULTIMEDIA
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Interactive Spotlights
    • Roofing Quizzes
    • IRE Videos
    • Webinars
    • Photo Galleries
  • PRODUCTS
    • New Products
    • Featured Products
  • COLUMNS
    • Editor's Note
    • Exit Planning
    • Guest Column
  • EVENTS
    • International Roofing Expo
    • Webinars
    • Best of Success Conference
    • Industry Events
  • DIRECTORY
    • Associations
    • Distributors
    • Manufacturer/Supplier
    • Business Services
    • Get Listed
  • MORE
    • Roofing Contractor Newsletters
    • Techos y Más Advisory Board
    • RC Store
    • Roofing Supply Pro
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • Market Research
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Company Spotlights
    • Classifieds
      • Auctions
      • Business For Sale
      • Business Opportunities
      • Equipment For Sale
      • Positions Available
      • Products
      • Safety
      • Software
      • Services
      • Training
    • Contact Us
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Advertise
      • Editorial Calendar
      • Contact
    • Archive Issues
  • SIGN UP!
Roofing Safety

Oregon OSHA Cites Two Contractors More Than $144,000 for Fall Protection Violations

Oregon OSHA
October 4, 2022

SALEM, Ore. — The Oregon Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has issued fines totaling more than $144,000 to two contractors for violations — including repeat offenses — of fall protection rules at worksites in Salem and Woodburn. 

The separate citations issued to Corvallis-based Iron Head Roofing LLC and Canby-based JMJ Construction LLC included the same violation of a basic safety requirement: Implementing adequate fall protection systems, such as a personal fall restraint system or other measures, where workers are exposed to falling six feet or more to a lower level.

Iron Head Roofing

The citation issued to Iron Head Roofing followed an inspection that found four of six employees working on the roof of a house in Salem with no fall protection. Fall protection systems were not in place where employees were exposed to a hazard of falling six feet or more to a lower level. It was a fifth repeat violation of the rule. The proposed penalty from Oregon OSHA is $78,000. For Iron Head Roofing, it was the fifth time since May 2019 that the company committed the same violation. 

The division's citation to Iron Head Roofing involved a single repeat violation carrying a total proposed penalty of $78,000.

JMJ Construction

The citation against JMJ Construction came after an inspection found an employee installing siding on a house with no fall protection. Another employee was using a scaffold with no fall protection, according to the inspection. Fall protection systems were not in place where employees were exposed to a hazard of falling six feet or more to a lower level. It was a fourth repeat violation of the rule. Proposed penalty: $58,500.

In addition, a portable ladder did not extend at least three feet above an upper landing. It was the first repeat violation of the rule. Oregon OSHA proposed a penalty of $4,500. The agency also found no personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems were put in place while a scaffold was in use. The proposed penalty is $3,900.

For JMJ Construction, it was the fourth time since February 2020 that the company committed the same violation. The companies' previous violations of the six-foot trigger-height requirements were cited as part of separate Oregon OSHA inspections at different worksites. The citation to JMJ Construction, which involved several violations, carried a total proposed penalty of $66,900.

Altogether, Oregon OSHA issued $144,900 in fines to both companies. Under Oregon OSHA rules, penalties multiply when employers commit repeat violations. Each of the citations issued to Iron Head Roofing and JMJ Construction also included a standard penalty reduction based on the small size of the company.

Both inspections were conducted under Oregon OSHA's emphasis program focused on fall hazards in construction. The prevention-based program accounts for the temporary nature of construction activity by directing inspectors to act based on observations while in the field, and to follow up on valid complaints and referrals.

Falls are one of the leading causes of death in the construction industry.

“Fall protection saves lives," said Renee Stapleton, acting administrator for Oregon OSHA. “It is an essential safety practice that employers must carry out when work is being done at heights. There is no excuse for neglecting it."

Employers have 30 calendar days after receiving a citation to file an appeal.

KEYWORDS: fall arrest systems fall prevention Oregon OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) violations

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
to unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • two-roofers-in-harnesses-on-tile-roof

    How AI Is (and Isn’t) Impacting Roofing Jobs

    A new study from Microsoft shows artificial intelligence...
    Roofing News
    By: Chris Gray
  • Baker-Roofing-Company-employees-on-flat-roof-examinining-paperwork

    Exclusive: 2025’s Top 100 Roofing Contractors

    Roofing Contractor's 2025 Top 100 list reveals revenue...
    Top 100 Roofing Contractors
    By: Chris Gray
  • A before and after heat measurement comparison

    How Hot is Too Hot in the Attic?

    If the ventilation is working, how hot should the attic...
    Sustainable Roofing
    By: Paul Scelsi
You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Sign Up for the Newsletter
  • Online Registration
  • Manage My Preferences
  • Subscription Customer Service

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Roofing Contractor audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of Roofing Contractor or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • A finished commercial roof, including flashings
    Sponsored byFlashCo

    It’s All in the Details – How to Avoid 4 Common Mistakes with Roofing Accessories

  • Happy mature couple using phone holding credit card making payments. Middle aged older man and woman doing ecommerce shopping on smartphone booking or buying online on mobile sitting at home table.
    Sponsored byWatercress Financial

    Meeting Modern Expectations: Why Offering Financing Is Essential for Roofers Today

  • A roofing contractor stands on a roof behind an American flag
    Sponsored byTAMKO®

    Building Roofs, Building Community: TAMKO’s Lasting Commitment to Veterans and the Military

Popular Stories

TWS Remodeling team

Private Equity Fallout Rocks Roofing; Pros Step In

Malarkey-logo-with-Charles-Collins-headshot

Malarkey Roofing Products Announces New President

roofer-safety-harness-construction.jpg

OSHA's Top 10 Most Cited Violations of 2025

Roofing Contractor Bookstore

Related Articles

  • Oregon OSHA

    Oregon OSHA Slaps Contractor with $105,800 in Penalties for Fall Protection Violations

    See More
  • OSHA

    Two Florida Roofing Contractors Hit with OSHA Fines for Fall Safety Violations

    See More
  • OSHA

    Oregon Contractor Fined More Than $38,000 for Multiple Job Safety Violations

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • cfc.png

    Construction Forms for Contractors Book+CD, PDF & Software Download

  • contractorlaw.jpg

    Construction Law: An Introduction for Engineers, Architects, and Contractors

See More Products
×

Be in the forefront of the roofing industry!

Join thousands of professionals today. Shouldn’t you know what they know?

JOIN NOW!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • X
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing