This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Jeff Edson of Restoration Roofing, formerly Western Systems Inc., in Longmont, Colo., had a dilemma. There was another roofing company nearby with a similar name (Western Roofing) and customers tended to confuse the two, so Jeff decided to enact a name change. He sought my opinion on his marketing strategy for a mailing campaign to inform clients of the name change to Restoration Roofing.
Everything Jeff was doing seemed right on the money to me, I advised. Since some people mixed up his company with another, it was a good idea to get the name changed, and the new one he'd chosen aptly described his business specialty. While he doubted that name confusion cost him any business, having two companies in a marketplace with a similar name can be unsettling. You have control over your company's performance and reputation, but can do nothing about the way others run theirs. Potential exists for bad publicity or liabilities associated with another company to cascade onto yours.