This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
What follows is a look back at some of the highlights and lowlights of this column in 2002.
We started the year by raising an eyebrow at the goings-on in Chicago over its new energy code that was set to go into effect on Jan. 1, 2002. This code was developed under the radar of the roofing industry but had major implications for us. The Chicago Roofing Contractors Association with help from the National Roofing Contractors Association spent considerable time and resources working with the City of Chicago to come up with a reasonable and workable energy code for roofing. As of this writing, the solution is still pending. When the final version is adopted, it will be better for the roofing industry while still giving building owners more options and better performing buildings. We stick with our story: Know and support your building and code officials, and your local political leaders as well.